Month: January 2012

Concrete Jungle:  Picking and Using Neglected Roadside Produce

Concrete Jungle: Picking and Using Neglected Roadside Produce

A few years ago, I saw my friend Ian outside of where I work, picking apples from a tree that I parked near every day.  I had never noticed that this small tree was an apple tree.  Later that week I went biking with Ian, and we went to several other locations where Ian gathered apples from trees around Cleveland. He used the apples to make apple butter.  Urban unharvested  and neglected fruit trees exist in lots of cities, and in larger amounts in cities in warm climates.

In 2009, Craig Durkin and Aubrey Daniels had noticed a large amount of apples growing on neglected trees all over Atlanta, GA. The group decided to create an annual gathering, nicknamed “Ciderfest,” to pick these apples and turn them into apple cider.

After several years of larger and larger apple harvests, Durkin and Daniels started Concrete Jungle, a non-profit, which after its third year has  documented nearly 1,000 fruit-bearing trees across the city, and has donated over 6,000 lbs of produce to local homeless shelters and charitable organizations.

They organize group harvest events, and harvest hundreds of fruit and nut trees in the Atlanta area that are by the side of the road or by buildings.    Before going out to harvest, the group documents the tree to make sure that it will yield healthy fruit. They also get verbal permission if the trees are on private land, and work with the land/business owners to get access to the trees.

Concrete Jungle sorts the fruit once picked, and checks for worms and bruised spots. They wash the fruit and donate to organizations that include churches, homeless shelters, and food banks.

The food map that they made on their site indicates over 573 locations  in Atlanta which include apples, peaches, blackberries, blueberries, figs, and other fruits and nuts.    If you live in the area, you can volunteer to help pick and the group uses Twitter and Facebook to list picking and community events.

 

Image Source:
Concrete Jungle

Links:

Concrete Jungle

Concrete Jungle – Food Map

Biophilia – Bjorks’s New Album of Nature +Music Ipad apps

Biophilia – Bjorks’s New Album of Nature +Music Ipad apps

Biophilia, a album and project by Bjork is the first album to be released as a suite of iPad and iPhone apps, and is intended to be experiential educational project that uses sound, texts and visuals that focus on natural science topics including plate tectonics, genetics and human biorhythms.

The project took over 3 years to develop, and Bjork, her record company, Apple, and National Geographic contributed to making an album that is the first album releases that worked with Apple to produce a series of iPad apps as an album.. Some key collabators to the project were made by David Attenborough,  who does narration on the project and Dr Nicola Dibben, a senior lecturer in music at Sheffield University, who wrote the essays that accompany every song. Also part of the team was a mathematician, British scientist and film-maker, and a robotics company’s director of engineering.

I downloaded the app, which currently has 9 song/apps that are available for purchase.  The application opens with an interactive view of star constellations, with bright stars labeled with names like sacrifice, thunderbolt, and virus.  A voiceover begins that  talks about where me nature, and that  much of it is hidden, we can not see or touch it , such as sound which is usually hidden.   The idea behind Biophilia is that nature, music, and technology come together- and you can listen, interact, and create.

I paid to download the song/application Virus, which said it was about the biological virus and the host. In the song notes, the piece talked about how Bjork was fighting a “candida issue” in her throat, and was learning to live with and get rid of a fungus in her.  The piece is about fungus inside of us, and living to live with it.

When I played the piece, the piece had images of cells that I could interact with while I could hear the song, and lips appeared inside of the cells.  I read that I am supposed to try to stop the attack of the virus (which were green.)  The directions did not tell me what to do – so I did what my four year old nephew would do – I just tried to touch and click everything.  I don’t think I was successful – since the piece is supposed to stop if I was successful, and it never stopped.   I kept swiping my ipad and watched as more green virus organisms surrounded the large cell, then green strings came in to surround the nucleus, and the song progressed into different keys.  Eventually the big cell disappeared – and the virus remained.

After the song ended – I was left with a cell/virus synthesizer of sort – where I could click and get different sounds which included bells, synthesizers, zylophones, etc.

Overall I was disappointed with the application.  The interface was unclear, and I did not feel that I got a meaningful experience with the music or ideas through the piece I downloaded.   The graphics and text of the main interface seem like something I would have seen 10 years ago, and I would have liked the option to read some direction or F.A.Qs about the piece.

At 1.99 a song – I’m not going to by the other 8.  Interactive mediums are always a challenge – but my experience with Biophilia did not seem like anything new except it was made by Bjork and her collaborators.

Image Source:
Creative Applications – Bjork Biophilia

Links:
Creative Applications – Bjork Biophilia

Bjork’s website

Biophelia application on Itunes

The Art of Mali Wu:  Can a city be turned back into a lake again?

The Art of Mali Wu: Can a city be turned back into a lake again?

Mali Wu is an artist from Taiwan who makes and also curates work that explores ecological issues and doing art projects that collaborate with communities.

Her work By the River, On the River, Of the River, made in 2006, she worked with communities that lived along northern Taiwan’s Danshui River. In Taipei, everyone has heard of the Danshui River, but not many people actually know what’s currently around or in the river.  The Danshui River is formed by 4 smaller rivers, and for the project she did river tracing of each river by crossing through Taipei in different boats.  The participants examined what the current water level and quality was.

The projec which had a symbolic significance was done in collaboration with the city of Taipei and the county’s community colleges. After the project, each college formed a river preservation alliance, and discussions about the river began to occur.

In 2008, Wu developed her project Taipei Tomorrow As Lake Again, which was part of the 2008 Taipei Biennale.  The piece was meant to be a criticism of the high amounts of pesticides that are used at the large international gardening exposition, the Flora Expo, which Taipei hosted that same year and to bring attention to the affect climate change could have on Taipei.

300 years ago, the location of Taipei was swamp and grassland, and the Taipei Basin was a lake.  In Wu’s garden installation Taipei Tomorrow as a Lake Again, she wanted to address global warming issues, and visualize what the city would be like if it was to become a lake again.  Working with urbanist group, Organisation of Urban Re-s (OURs), Wu planted a mobile kitchen garden on the terrace of the Taipei Fine Arts Museum.   Potatoes, peppermint, and other vegetables and herbs were bordered with up-side-down beverage crates that served as pathways between the garden beds.  Exhibition visitors were invited to harvest the garden.

The project also was comprised of an installation and a series of workshops and actions which included  Eco-building, Bike Paradise, Farm City and Flood Taipei. These were designed to stimulate discussion and to motivate people to take a new look at Taipei’s urban policy.

Taiwan is a country that imports most of its food, but environment questions are not commonly discussed.  With her piece, Mali Wu is proposing that the City of Taipei work to allocate cropland in the city so that in the future the country can provide for itself.

When asked about the role of art in environmental issues Wu says,”  I think art stimulates the mind, but I wouldn’t compare an artist to an environmentalist… Environmentalists are focused in making changes; artists, on the other hand, tell the same story with a different medium, they also give the mind an alternative suggestion – this, I think, is the only difference between the two.”(1)

Image Source:
Taipei Biennial

Links/Sources:

(1) Interview with Wu Mali

Wu Mali at the Taipei Biennial

Flora Expo

 

 

 

 

 

Getting Over Environmentalism :  Has “Sustainablity” eliminated environmentalism?

Getting Over Environmentalism : Has “Sustainablity” eliminated environmentalism?

Today I dialed in to Orion Magazine’s online/phone conference meeting called Getting Over Environmentalism: Live Discussion with Paul Kingsnorth and Friends on January 18.  The discussion focused on whether “environmentalism” gone off course and questioned what sustainability has to do with a healthy planet.

The session started with the Paul Kingsnorth speaking, author of “Confessions of a Recovering Environmentalist” an article in in the current issue of Orion.  In his article he writes about how environmentalism has effectively died.  On the one hand it has been absorbed by the political left, which has diluted its ecocentric message; on the other, it has been taken over by the vision of a new “sustainable economy” which amounts to business-as-usual without the carbon.

Kingsnorth talked about how he became an “environmentalist” due to his strong emotional connection to issues about the land, water, mountains, and animals and these are not common values of “environmentalists” today.  Today’s environmentalism focuses on promoting “sustainability,” which focuses on a completely different idea:  sustaining human civilization at the comfort level that we feel is our right, without continuing to destroy the “natural capital” or the “resource base” that is needed to do so.  Sustainabilty is currently primarily carbon-centric, and is about sustaining what Kingsnorth called our “empire” of humans.

Eco-centric narratives have disappeared from the word “green,” which used to mean preserving nature: mountains, seas, animals, etc.  Kingsworth mentioned that today the word often means putting wind turbines and solar panels into the natural environment.

What are the next steps that need to be taken?  He talked about how we must go back to the original green values, we can’t pretend that our system is not going to collapse, and we must begin to believe that we are destroying our environment in order to work to save it.

The next speaker was Lierre Keith who is writer, small farmer, and radical feminist activist. She started her talk by saying that 200 species will go extinct today, 98% of forests are gone, and 99% of prairies are gone.  We have greatly impacted the environment.

She also talked about how the environmental movement today is focused on saving civilization from destruction of its own action and that our current infrastructure is not sustainable.  She mentioned Manhattan as an example, which is – under all the city – an island. This island is not able to sustain itself on its own water, land, and resources – so other places around the country use resources to sustain the way of life in New York.  It is an example of how we take more than the land can give.

Keith talked about our current culture and said, “Our way of life has been a one time blowout and its over.”  She went on to say that we are in a culture of entitlement and that a radical shift is needed.  The solution? It’s a big one.  We will have to eliminate our systems – dams, coal, oil, pipelines, etc – and work to non-violently shut down the system.

One example she gave of people effectively shutting down the system was in France in 2010, when citizens used non-violence actions to shut down the economy for 3 weeks, by “blocking oil.” She said that movements like Occupy, and 350.org are examples of group action– but more needs to be done on a larger scale.  “It’s a war and it is time to fight back,” she said.

The effects of our way of life are not always visible, but we are changing the natural environment. Today in China, there are places that do not have flowering plants due to the elimination of pollinators.  This is in places that for thousands of years had this kind of wildlife – and is an indicator of how we affect the natural world.

During the phone conference, there were other speakers, a question and answer section where individuals could email questions for the speakers, and concluding remarks.

All the speakers closed by saying that in order for change to happen we will have to lose faith in our current system.  Currently we are comfortable, and those that are not believe in the promise that they could be comfortable and join in.  There are individuals who want change – but don’t know what to do. The system is breaking down – and it is not going to get better.  What can be done to change this?  All the speakers talked about joining together in solidarity for change is our future for change.

Since I heard this session, this has really gotten me thinking about the term “green” and sustainability, and the shift that the speakers talked about in terms of environmentalism.  I plan to do some research, and write another post about the history of the word “green.”

The session will be posted in the multimedia area of the Orion Magazine website, and I recommend streaming it – to get a new (even radical) perspective on the environment and sustainability.

 

Image Source:
Kristen Baumlier

Links:

Paul Kingsnorth, author of “Confessions of a Recovering Environmentalist” an article in in the current issue of Orion (January 2011)

Listen to the Getting Over Environmentalism: Live Discussion with Paul Kingsnorth and Friends podcast:  http://www.orionmagazine.com/multimedia

Lierre Keith’s Deep Green Resistance Book

 

What is a Passive House?

What is a Passive House?

I recently saw listed on the Green City Blue Lake calendar an opportunity to tour a passive house that was recently constructed in the Cleveland area this week.  The tour was booked, but I stopped by yesterday at the site of the house to take a peek.

What is a passive house? (or Passivhaus in German?) The basic idea of a Passive House is to reduce the energy usage of a home by 90% over traditional code built homes, and is the highest energy standard in a building.  Well-insulated, almost air-tight – a passive house minimizes energy loss through excellent thermal performance, exceptional airtightness with mechanical ventilation.

“Passive”  describes the idea of energy receptivity and retention  The house works with natural resources and free solar energy, and does not work with any “active” systems.

Often passive houses have triple-glazed windows, are super-insulated, and have a airtight shell around it – which helps balance heating, cooling, and ventilation.

In the last 10 years more than 15,000 buildings in Europe have been designed and built or remodeled to the passive house standard.  -Single and multifamily residences, schools, factories and office buildings have all been built with the passive house design.  There have been over 30,000 passive houses built to date, many after the year 2000.

In the Cleveland area, the second house applying for Passive House certification was completed and is the Butler-Nissen house located at 2200 Devonshire Dr. in Cleveland Heights, OH. The tour of the house was booked last Saturday, but be on the lookout for more tours of the home in the future.

 

Links:

www.passivehouse.us/passiveHouse/PHIUSHome.html

www.neogreenbuilding.org/